October 7, 2006 | Filed under: Internet TV
Assuming that users will not pay for most content and that advertising/sponsorship is the most likely way to monetize...
Assuming an optimistic CPM of roughly $50 for show sponsorship like we are seeing from the likes of Rocketboom...
And download costs / GB at roughly $0.20 from a service like Amazon S3...
Shall we say 250MB per show so that it is decent quality...?
That means that - optimistically - each download has a variable cost of:
($50/1000) - (0.20/4) = $0 break even
So with no staff, no infrastructure, a very good CPM and a 100% inventory sale, a video site could break even.
P2P isn't a nice-to-have in this world... its a necessity.
It looks like Venice and Revver are well placed...
Like what you're reading? Subscribe to my feed.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.morle.net/mt/mt-tb.cgi/261
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Video Business Models - P2P is Necessary:
» Scobleizer: Where's the Money in Video? from Phil Morle: Adventures in Entertainment and Technology
Today Robert Scoble walked into the same wall I crashed into a couple of weeks ago. Business models for video are challenging. For sub 10 minute, low quality, user generated content like YouTube the ad CPM is tiny or zero. For... [Read More]
Tracked on October 21, 2006 11:38 AM
» conference call service from conference call service
Once you discover the facts you were trying to track down, you can put it to work. [Read More]
Tracked on September 18, 2007 8:42 PM